Skip to content

docs(site): explain WebSocket offline model configuration - #3895

Merged
LauraGPT merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/site-websocket-model-options-20261114
Nov 13, 2026
Merged

LauraGPT merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/site-websocket-model-options-20261114

Conversation

@LauraGPT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Publish the Shanghai2026-11-14 bilingual tutorial websocket-offline-model-options in the existing article corpus and archive. Explain offline versus streaming model options, the source fix in #3887/#3888, copied-script versus package identity, and a read-only AST audit that does not import the server or load weights.

Keep the existing featured navigation, layout and previously published articles unchanged. The dated article references pinned public source and states the synthetic routing evidence limits; it makes no pretrained quality, performance or adoption claim.

Validation

  • Missing catalogue entry reproduced as one expected failing test before article insertion.
    -22 scoped Python tests pass:11 new article tests plus11 existing article tests. Both source and built pages execute the source-inspection example.
  • Two deterministic builds:277 files, each with210 validated HTML pages.
  • Four new-article private desktop/mobile ZH/EN browser cases pass; screenshots reviewed.
  • Full exact-head site/browser/docs CI is required before normal merge. Public deployment and actual-page hashes are separate post-merge gates, not yet claimed by this PR.

This is a static documentation change only. No new ASR/GPU quality experiment, model download or production service operation.

Publish one dated bilingual source-configuration tutorial with an executable read-only example and explicit test limits.

Signed-off-by: LauraGPT <zhifu.gzf@alibaba-inc.com>
@LauraGPT
LauraGPT merged commit af12472 into main Nov 13, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant